#OSPOLYDecides2026: ‘Don't Spoil Main Campus As You Spoiled Koko Campus’ — Muslat Supporters
By Victor Olubiye
OSPOLY presidential race is getting hotter, and supporters of presidential aspirant MUSLAT are asking students to look beyond campaign promises and examine the leadership experience of the candidates seeking to lead the institution.
At the centre of their argument is OGM, whose previous association with Koko Campus has become a talking point among MUSLAT supporters ahead of the election.
Their message is simple: if a leader could not deliver the kind of leadership they expected at Koko Campus, should students hand over the larger responsibility of Main Campus to the same person?
According to the supporters, Koko Campus was given a smaller unit of responsibility, but they believe the campus did not experience the level of impact they expected.
They point to what they describe as inadequate projects, welfare concerns and a leadership voice they felt was missing when students needed representation.
And now, they are asking OSPOLITES to think beyond friendship, familiarity and campaign excitement.
“If he could not protect the small, how will he protect the big?” they ask.
“If he could not stand for you when the power was small, will he stand for you when the power is big?”
For them, the question is not simply about who wants the presidency.
It is about who has already demonstrated what they can do with responsibility.
They argue that OSPOLY should not become a place where students' interests are subjected to what they describe as “trial and error” leadership.
The supporters also criticised what they see as a political culture in which students are remembered mainly during election periods.
Their message to OSPOLITES is therefore direct:
Don't vote simply because someone is your friend.
Don't vote simply because someone has settled you.
Don't vote because of popularity alone.
Instead, they want students to examine the candidates' previous experiences, promises and records before making their choice.
Their argument is that leadership should not begin with the title.
It should begin with what a person has already done when nobody was watching.
As the election draws closer, the debate around OGM's Koko Campus experience is likely to remain part of the conversation among students.
For MUSLAT supporters, the choice is ultimately about whether OSPOLITES want a leader who is still learning the ropes or someone they believe has already demonstrated the capacity to represent students.
OSPOLY is not a laboratory, they insist.
And their closing message to students is clear:
«“Let us vote for the one who stood with us when he had no title, so he can stand for us when he has the title.”»
Let us vote for the heart that feels OSPOLITE.
Note: The claims and characterisations concerning OGM's Koko Campus record in this commentary are those advanced by MUSLAT supporters and have not been independently verified by The Creativity Site. OGM's response was not included in the material available for this commentary.



Comments